Maine Potato Board Project Report 2005

 

Screening the exotic Solanum germplasm for tolerance to abiotic stresses

Benildo G. de los Reyes

Dept. of Biological Sciences, University of Maine-Orono

 

Executive Summary

Abiotic stresses such as low temperature, drought and salinity are agronomic problems that limit the productivity of most food crops including potato.  Breeding to enhance stress tolerance of commercial cultivars has not been very successful due the narrow genetic base of cultivated germplasm. In this study, we used a combination of physiological and molecular strategies to assess the extent of natural variation for abiotic stress tolerance between the cultivated and wild species of Solanum, with the goal of identifying potential donors for future use in cultivar improvement.  

Species of the genus Solanum exhibit wide variation with respect to tolerance to chilling and freezing temperatures. Results of physiological studies that measured the differences in low temperature-induced damage to the cell membrane showed that wild species are generally hardier than the cultivated potatoes. Species can be ranked according to increasing sensitivity to chilling as follows: S. commersonii < S. polytrichon = S. stoloniferum < S. boliviense = S. tuberosum < S. trifidum.  Furthermore, the South Argentinian species S. commersonii also exhibited the highest degree of tolerance to freezing (< -10oC). Freezing tolerance of this species is a consequence of its ability to cold acclimate during extended exposure to chilling (2oC to 4oC). S. polytrichon was also able to cold acclimate but exhibited moderate tolerance to freezing compared to S. commersonii. The other species including S. trifidum and the cultivated S. tuberosum are not capable of cold acclimation and thus are very sensitive to freezing. Analysis of the differential responses of the species to salinity and dehydration/osmotic stress induced artificially in hydroponics medium showed that the cold acclimating species exhibited moderate tolerance to salinity and osmotic/dehydration stresses. The current results indicate that the physiological and biochemical basis of tolerance to each of the three stress regimes are very complex and not completely identical. Comparative molecular studies showed that cold-acclimating species can be distinguished from non-acclimating species by the expression patterns of homologous genes associated with cold and drought tolerance in other plant species. Further genetic tests are currently in progress to determine if these genes can be used to develop markers for large-scale germplasm screening.

 

Project Accomplishments

Funds obtained in 2005 from the Maine Potato Board were used to establish procedures for screening the Solanum germplasm for abiotic stress tolerance. Experiments conducted were focused on the development of simple physiological and molecular techniques that allowed preliminary assessment of the extent of genetic variation for stress tolerance within the genus. The major aspects of the project results are summarized as follows:

 

Variation in low temperature stress tolerance. Five wild species accessions (S. commersonii, S. boliviense, S. polyctrichon, S. trifidum, S. stoloniferum) and four cultivated genotypes (Red Pontiac, Superior, Kennebec, Russett Burbank) were compared with respect to their responses to extended exposure to chilling temperature (2oC). Chilling injury was assessed by the leakage of cellular electrolytes resulting from physical damage to the cell membrane (Membrane Injury Index, MII). The results study showed a continuous variation for tolerance to chilling among the wild and cultivated species.  The relative ranking of species and cultivars according to increasing sensitivity to are follows: S. commersonii < S. polytrichon = S. stoloniferum < S. boliviense = S. tuberosum < S. trifidum (Fig. 1).  S. commersonii, a species that originated from South Argentina can also acclimate to low temperature, which leads to further hardening. Two weeks (11 to 14 days) exposure to 2oC can efficiently induce the cold acclimation response (Fig. 2).  S. polytrichon can also cold acclimate but to a relatively lesser degree compared to S. commersonii. Exposure to 2oC does not have significant effect on the freezing hardiness of S. boliviense, S. polytrichon, S.stoloniferum, S. trifidum and the cultivated S. tuberosum.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Figure 1. Variation in chilling-induced membrane injury among Solanum species. Plants at mid-vegetative stage were incubated for a maximum of 11 days at 2oC, the optimum temperature previously reported to induce cold acclimation in some Solanum species (Chen and Li, 1980). Membrane Injury Index (MII) is equal to the ratio of the percentage electrolyte leakage (%EL) between the plants grown at chilling (2oC) and control (28oC) temperatures. MII = 1 indicates no significant leakage of electrolytes due to chilling, while MII > 1 indicates significant leakage due to chilling. 1 – S. boliviense (PI 265860); 2 – S. commersonii (Oka 5040); 3 – S. trifidum (PI 255541); 4 – S. polytrichon (PI 184773); 5 – S. stoloniferum (PI 283109); 6 – S. commersonii (PI 472833); 7 – S. tuberosum (Red Pontiac); 8 – S. tuberosum (Superior); 9 – S. tuberosum (Russet Burbank); 10 – S. tuberosum (Kennebec). The relative ranking of Solanum species according to increasing levels of chilling sensitivity are as follows: S. commersonii < S. polytrichon = S. stoloniferum < S. boliviense = S. tuberosum < S. trifidum. ** Means were significantly greater than 1 at P<0.005; * Means were significantly greater than 1 at P<0.01; Error bars are shown as standard error of the mean, n = 4. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Figure 2. Differential responses of Solanum species to cold-acclimation.  Statistically significant differences in the mean MII were detected only in S. commersonii and S. polytrichon, indicating that CA in Solanum is species-dependent. 1 – S. boliviense (PI 265860); 2 – S. commersonii (Oka 5040); 3 – S. trifidum (PI 255541); 4 – S. polytrichon (PI 184773); 5 – S. stoloniferum (PI 283109); 6 – S. commersonii (PI 472833); 7 – S. tuberosum (Red Pontiac); 8 – S. tuberosum (Superior); 9 – S. tuberosum (Russet Burbank); 10 – S. tuberosum (Kennebec). ** Means were significantly different between control and CA plants at P<0.005; * Means were significantly different between control and CA plants at P<0.025; Error bars are shown as standard error of the mean, n = 4. 

Variation in salinity and dehydration stress tolerance. We developed a quick and simple method for physiological screening for salinity and dehydration (physiologically induced by osmotic stress) tolerance. This methodology involves exposure of plants during their mid-vegetative growth phase to high NaCl (300 mM) and high mannitol (200mM) concentrations in hydroponics medium (0.25x Hoagland’s).  Like in the low temperature experiments, species and cultivars responded differently to high salt and osmotic stress treatments (Fig. 3). The species that was able to cold acclimate (S. commersonii) exhibited moderate tolerance to salinity and osmotic stresses. The relative cultivar ranking based on the level of salt and dehydration sensitivity was not completely identical to the ranking based on low temperature sensitivity. These results indicate that the physiological and biochemical basis of tolerance to each of the three stress regimes are very complex and not completely identical. Further physiological experiments are required to assess the extent of inter-specific variation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Figure  3. The same set of species differentials used in the cold acclimation experiments were studied for their responses to 3 day-exposure to salinity (300mM NaCl) and osmotic/dehydration (200mM mannitol) stresses. In general, the relative cultivar ranking based on cold hardiness was much similar to the NaCl than the mannitol stress ranking. 1 – S. boliviense (PI 265860);

2 – S. commersonii (Oka 5040); 3 – S. trifidum (PI 255541); 4 – S. polytrichon (PI 184773);

5 – S. stoloniferum (PI 283109); 6 – S. commersonii (PI 472833); 7 – S. tuberosum (Red Pontiac); 8 – S. tuberosum (Superior); 9 – S. tuberosum (Russet Burbank); 10 – S. tuberosum (Kennebec). ** Means were significantly greater than 1 at P< 0.005; * Means were significantly greater than 1 at P<0.01; Error bars are shown as standard error of the mean, n = 5. 

 

 

Differential expression of cold-acclimation associated genes. The cold acclimation and drought stress response genetic network has been elucidated in plant genetic models. The network is comprised of hundreds of genes that function either as a ‘regulator’ or ‘effector’ of cellular defense mechanisms. We sequenced the cDNAs corresponding to some of the well characterized regulators (CBF1, ZAT12 and RAV1 transcription factors) and effectors of physiological defense mechanisms (COR78, GolS-2, GolS-3). Analysis of the stress-induced activities of these genes by gene-specific semi-quantitative polymerase chain reaction indicated that the cold-acclimating species (stress tolerant) can be distinguished from the non-acclimating species (stress intolerant) by genotype-specific expression signatures. The stress tolerant species generally exhibited more robust induction of the expression of both the regulator and effector genes under cold stress conditions (Fig. 4).

 

Tools for further genomics studies. The current findings will be used to further establish a robust molecular method for screening the Solanum germplasm for tolerance to abiotic stresses and to elucidate the molecular basis of tolerance mechanisms by semi-global (large-scale) analysis of stress-induced changes on gene expression. Hence, we have used a portion of the grant from the Maine Potato Board to purchase a set of gene chips (containing >30,000 potato genes) from The Institute of Genomics Research (TIGR). The gene chips are currently being used for more in-depth analysis of the variation revealed by the current data.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Figure 4. Solanum homologs of genes associated with the CA response in Arabidopsis were investigated by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. Cold-acclimating and non-acclimating species can be distinguished by the expression patterns of cold acclimation-associated genes. The transcription factor CBF1 is a major regulator of the cold acclimation gene regulon (Stockinger et al., 1997). RAV1 and ZAT12 are newly identified transcription factors with possible roles in cold acclimation (Fowler and Thomashow, 2002). COR78 is one of the known targets of CBF1 via the C-repeat/DRE cis-elements. GolS-2 and GolS-3 encode galactinol synthases involved in the synthesis of osmoprotectants (raffinose-family of oligosaccharides) during cold stress (Taji et al., 2002). These genes are also potentially regulated through the CBF1/RAV1/ZAT12 pathway. In general, the transcription factors and their putative targets exhibited distinct expression profiles in each of the Solanum species. For instance, cold-induced expression occurred earlier in the cold-acclimating species (S. commersonii, Oka 5040) than in the non-acclimating species (S. boliviense, S. trifidum and S. tuberosum cvs. Red Pontiac, Superior). ZAT12 transcripts were not detected in S. trifidum. GolS-3 transcripts were not detected in S. trifidum and S. tuberosum.

 

 

Experimental Strategy

Cold-Acclimation. Plants were established to five-leaf stage at 28oC, 12 hr photoperiod (control condition). For cold-acclimation (CA), plants were incubated for a maximum of 11 days at 2oC, 10 hr photoperiod. To assess the differences in chilling-induced membrane injury during CA, electrical conductivity (EC) was measured on leaf discs collected from control and cold-treated plants at 4, 7 and 11 days. Percent electrolyte leakage (%EL) in the control and cold-treated plants was determined by the following equation:  EC-Tr/EC-Total x 100, where EC-Tr is the amount of electrolytes that leaked from the tissue and EC-Total is the total tissue electrolytes measured after boiling the leaf discs for 30 min in water bath. Membrane Injury Index (MII) was calculated by the following equation: %EL-Treatment/%EL-control.

 

Freezing Tolerance. Plants that have been cold acclimated at 2oC for 11 days were transferred to a freezing chamber (-10oC) for 1 hr. Leaf discs were collected and membrane injury was assessed with the same procedures used in the cold acclimation experiment.

 

Salinity and Osmotic Stress Tolerance. Plants grown under control condition (28oC, 12 hr photoperiod) in the soil were transferred and acclimated in hydroponics medium (0.25X Hoagland’s) for one week. At the beginning of the second week, the hydroponics medium was supplemented with high NaCl and high mannitol at a final concentration of 300mM and 200mM, respectively. EC was measured in each sample after 3 days of stress.

 

Semi-quantitative RT-PCR. Total RNA was isolated from leaf tissues with the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen). The cDNA templates were synthesized from 0.5 ug total RNA with the ImProm-II Reverse Transcription System (Promega). Semi-quantitative RT-PCR was performed on 0.05 ug of cDNA using the PCR Master Mix (Promega) for 22 to 24 cycles in the iCycler thermal cycler (Biorad). Gene-specific primers were designed from  the potato cDNA sequences and ESTs available in the GenBank.  The expression of the actin gene was used to normalize transcript abundance between the treatments and control.   

 

 

Conclusion

Significant genetic genetic variation for abiotic stress tolerance was detected among cultivated and exotic species of Solanum using both physiological and molecular parameters. Correlation between low temperature stress tolerance with salinity and dehydration stress tolerance was moderately significant. S. commersonii, a wild species from Southern Argentina is a potential source of genes or alleles associated with stress tolerance. Further physiological and molecular characterization is currently underway to understand the genetic and biochemical basis of the stress tolerance exhibited by this species.

 

 

References

Chen HH, Li PH (1980) Plant Physiol 65:1146-1148.

Fowler S, Thomashow MF (2002) Plant Cell 14:1675-1690.

Stockinger EJ, Gilmour SJ, Thomashow MF (1997) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:1035-1040.

Taji T, Ohsumi C, Iuchi S, et al. (2002) Plant J 29:417-426.